Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Shocking the system: AEDs in military resuscitation
  1. Andrew M Buckley1,
  2. A T Cox2 and
  3. P Rees3
  1. 1 Department of Acute Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, Harrow, UK
  2. 2 Royal Centre Defence Medicine, Defence Medical Services, Lichfield, UK
  3. 3 Department of Cardiology, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK
  1. Correspondence to Andrew M Buckley, Department of Acute Medicine, Northwick Park Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK; ambuckley{at}live.co.uk

Abstract

Automated external defibrillator (AED) devices have been in routine clinical use since the early 1990s to deliver life-saving shocks to appropriate patients in non-clinical environments. As expectations of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest increase, and evidence incontrovertibly points to reduced timelines as the most crucial factor in achieving return of spontaneous circulation, questions regarding the availability and location of AEDs in the UK military need to be readdressed. This article explores the background of AEDs and reviews their history, life-saving potential and defines current and best practice. It goes on to review the evidence surrounding training and looks to identify knowledge gaps that might be addressed effectively by future research. Finally, it makes recommendations regarding training, availability of AEDs on military bases and locations most likely to deliver good outcomes for military personnel in the future.

  • AED
  • defibrillator
  • training
  • military
  • SCD
  • sudden cardiac death

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AMB, ATC and PR were equal contributors to the research analysis and presentation of this paper.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.