Up to 70 % of military amputees suffer phantom limb pain (PLP), which is difficult to treat. PLP has been attributed to cortical reorganisation and associated with impaired laterality. Repeated sessions of mirror therapy (MT) can benefit PLP; however, anecdotal evidence suggests one MT session could be effective. In a one-group pretest and post-test design, 16 UK military unilateral lower limb amputees (median age: 31.0, 95% CI 25.0 to 36.8 years) undertook one 10 min MT session. Visual analogue scale (VAS) pain and laterality (accuracy and reaction time) measurements were taken pre-MT and post-MT. Median VAS PLP did not differ significantly between pre-MT 15 mm (2–53 mm) and post-MT 12 mm (1–31) (p=0.875) scores. For the amputated limb, there were no significant differences between pre-MT and post-MT scores for laterality accuracy, 95.3%, 95% CI 90.5% to 97.6% and 96.7%, 95% CI 90.0% to 99.4%, respectively (p=0.778), or reaction time, 1.42 s, 95% CI 1.11 to 2.11 s and 1.42 s, 95% CI 1.08 to 2.02 s, respectively (p=0.629). Laterality was also not different between limbs for accuracy, p=0.484, or reaction time, p=0.716, and did not correlate with PLP severity. No confounding variables predicted individual responses to MT. Therefore, one 10 min MT session does not affect laterality and is not effective as standard treatment for PLP in military lower limb amputees. However, substantial PLP improvement for one individual and resolution of a stuck phantom limb for another infers that MT may benefit specific patients. No correlation found between PLP and laterality implies associated cortical reorganisation may not be the main driver for PLP. Further research, including neuroimaging, is needed to help clinicians effectively target PLP.
- military amputees
- phantom limb pain
- mirror therapy
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Contributors Major APW undertook the study and completed all data collection and wrote the paper. VS contributed to and amended the paper.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared
Patient consent Parental/guardian consent obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Data sharing statement There is no additional data available.
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.