Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Risk factors for mental ill health in UK Army personnel: an overview
  1. David Ross1,
  2. D F Mackay2 and
  3. B P Bergman2
  1. 1 Army Health Unit, Royal Army Medical Corps, Aldershot, Surrey, UK
  2. 2 Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
  1. Correspondence to David Ross, Army Health Unit, Royal Army Medical Corps, Camberley GU15 4NA, UK; ParkesProf{at}btinternet.com

Abstract

Women in the UK military are more commonly diagnosed with a mental health disorder than men, but the reasons for this difference are not fully understood. This literature review identifies the risk factors for mental ill health in military personnel before serving, during service and as a veteran. The interaction of risk factors is complex and, in some cases, may be synergistic, such as experiencing adverse events in childhood and exposure to combat. Identification of risk factors allows further research to better understand differences between men and women, and the impact of these risk factors on army personnel. In turn this will inform better preventive strategies, which could be targeted at the primary, secondary or tertiary levels.

  • mental health
  • occupational & industrial medicine
  • public health

Data availability statement

No data are available. This is not a clinical trial and therefore there is no data.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

No data are available. This is not a clinical trial and therefore there is no data.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors This is a literature review originally carried out by DR, which was used to develop a research protocol to investigate gender and mental ill health in the UK Armed Forces. DR wrote the initial draft based on that review and DFM and BPB provided editorial input to the final version.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; externally peer reviewed.