Background Obesity is a serious health problem with an incidence that is increasing rapidly. Enlisted men are a distinctive group characterised by 24-hour community-living and are likely to experience changes in body weight as a result of regular diet and exercise during enlistment.
Methods This study reviewed data from the Second Military Health Survey. Changes in body mass index (BMI) before and during military service were analysed using paired t-test. We calculated OR and 95% CI for factors affecting weight improvement during military service through logistic regression.
Results The mean BMI in the underweight group increased by 5.87 kg/m2 during service, while that in the normal weight group increased by 1.18 kg/m2. In contrast, the mean BMI in the overweight group decreased by 5.47 kg/m2 during service. The OR for an improved BMI in the subjective good health group compared with the subjective poor health group was statistically significant (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.87). The OR for an improved BMI was significantly higher in the group with three or more times per week of strength training than in the group with one to two times per week of strength training, and was higher among the marines compared with the Army soldiers (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.12 and OR=2.15, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.32, respectively).
Conclusions Strength training showed a statistically significant increase in BMI during military service. Furthermore, the BMI of men who were underweight before their service increased, while it decreased among those who were overweight.
- public health
- occupational & industrial medicine
- diabetes & endocrinology
Data availability statement
No data are available.
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.
The number of overweight or obese Korean men has been increasing rapidly.
Most men are required to go through military service in their early 20s and this is an important shared experience for them.
Enlisted men are a distinctive group characterised by 24-hour community life.
They are likely to experience changes in body weight as a result of regular diet and exercise during enlistment.
Regular diet and exercise during military service improved enlisted men’s body mass index.
According to the WHO, the number of obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2) people worldwide has tripled since 1975, and as of 2016, 39% of adults are overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) or obese.1 Excess body fat impairs health and increases the risk of mortality and morbidity such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, musculoskeletal disorders and cancer.2–7 Obesity is a serious health problem, and its incidence has been increasing rapidly not only in Western countries, but also in many Asian countries, including South Korea.8–11 Although the rate of obesity in South Korea is lower than that in any other country of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, it has increased in recent years.12–14 In particular, the number of overweight or obese Korean men has been increasing rapidly.7 15–17
South Korean men are required by the Military Service Act to undergo draft physical examination in the year they turn 19 years old.18 They must also serve in the military for approximately two years during a certain period.19 Men are required to go through military service in their early 20s and this is an important shared experience for them.20
Previous studies in adolescents and adults have shown that obesity is related to factors such as sex, age, race, eating habits, smoking, physical activity, sleep duration, stress and depression.21–26 Enlisted men are a distinctive group characterised by 24-hour community life.20 They are likely to experience changes in body weight as a result of regular diet and exercise during enlistment. However, studies on obesity among enlisted Korean soldiers are scarce; domestic studies have been conducted mainly on military officers.7
This study aimed to analyse changes in BMI of enlisted men before and during military service and to investigate the effects of military life, with its regular diet and exercise, on BMI. Our principal conclusion is that BMI improves to normal during military service, irrespective of whether the individual participant was overweight or underweight before service.
Materials and methods
Study design and participants
This study reviewed data from the Second Military Health Survey (2015) after obtaining approval from the School of Military Medicine in South Korea.27–30 The Second Military Health Survey included a final sample of 2500 officers and enlisted men in the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force after stratification for class, branch of military service and regional distribution using a questionnaire from July to August 2015. The response rate was 100.0% as all officers and enlisted soldiers completed the survey. This study used the data collected from the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force enlisted men performing mandatory military service. After the exclusion of 520 officers and eight enlisted men who provided incomplete responses, 1972 were included in the final analysis. In addition, to compare BMI before and during military service for each participant, data on BMI before service were collected from the Military Entrance Physical Examination database conducted on the day of enlistment, after obtaining approval from the Republic of Korea Army Headquarters Personnel Administration. ‘During military service’ was defined as the time of response to the survey.
Main outcome variables
Changes in BMI were determined by calculating the difference in BMI (BMI during military service − BMI before military service) for each participant. Participants with BMI <18.5 kg/m2 were classified as underweight, those with BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 were classified as normal weight, and those with BMI ≥25 kg/m2 were classified as overweight. Change in BMI was analysed according to whether the participant’s weight during service was maintained, improved or deteriorated compared with the weight before service. Weight was considered maintained if the weight during military service was unchanged compared with the weight before service. Weight was considered to have improved if an individual who was underweight or overweight before service had normal weight during service. Weight was considered to have deteriorated if an individual with normal weight before service became either underweight or overweight during service, or if someone underweight before service became overweight, or if someone overweight became underweight during service.
Because the participants in this study were all male, the variable sex was excluded from the general characteristics. Age was divided into three categories: <20, 20–21 and ≥22 years. Educational level was divided into high school graduates and college graduates or above. Smoking status was classified into non-smoker, ex-smoker and current smoker. Subjective health status was rated according to responses on a 5-point Likert scale: very good, good, normal, poor and very poor. Responses of ‘very good’ and ‘good’ were grouped together as ‘good’, and responses of ‘poor’ and ‘very poor’ were grouped together as ‘poor’.
Physical activity was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaires and was based on the metabolic equivalent of task (MET). The physical activity variable was calculated as MET-min/week scores. Total physical activity was divided into those who did not exercise except for activities of daily life (METs <600), those who exercised some (600≤METs≤3000) and those who exercised more to promote health (METs >3000).31 32
Strength training was not scored as MET in the questionnaire domain was related to physical activity. Strength training was used as a separate variable and classified as none, one to two times per week, and three or more times per week based on participants’ responses to the number of days they performed the training.
Sleep duration was divided into three categories: less than six hours, six to seven hours, and eight or more hours. Sleep disturbance was rated according to three items (having difficulty falling asleep, difficulty staying asleep and lack of sleep due to waking up too early) using a 5-point Likert scale. Responses of ‘slightly severe’ and ‘very severe’ were grouped together as having sleep disturbance, whereas other responses were grouped as having no sleep disturbance.
Military characteristics were classified according to the branch participants served in (Army, Navy, Marine Corps or Air Force) and were further divided into combat branch, technical branch and administrative/special branch. Service period was divided into four categories: <6, 6–11, 12–17 and ≥18 months. The types of workplace were divided into large, middle and small cities; ‘gun’ (country), ‘eup’ (town) and ‘myeon’ (township); and remote areas. Working hours were classified into <40 hours, 40–55 hours and ≥56 hours.
The general and military characteristics of the participants were analysed using frequency analysis. Changes in BMI before and during military service were analysed using paired t-test. Changes in weight before and during military service were divided into maintenance, improvement and deterioration and were analysed using the χ2 test. Fisher’s exact test was performed when an expected frequency was <5. To identify the factors affecting improvements in BMI, we performed a logistic regression analysis after excluding the maintenance group and setting the deterioration group as the reference group, and then calculated the OR and 95% CI. We considered values of p<0.05 as statistically significant. All analyses were performed using SAS V.9.4 software.
A high proportion of participants were aged 20–21 years (1521 or 77.1% of all participants). A high proportion also reported that they were non-smokers, their perceived health was good, they performed strength training three or more times per week, and their stress level was moderate.
From before military service to during, BMI in smokers increased by 0.35 kg/m2, which is statistically significant (p=0.0372). Similarly, BMI increased by 0.47 kg/m2 (p=0.0454) in those reporting no strength training and by 0.37 kg/m2 (p=0.0148) in those whose perceived stress level was moderate (Table 1).
Changes in body weight during military service are shown in Table 2. Of the participants, 28.4% improved in weight, which is a much higher proportion than those whose weight deteriorated (15.5%). Among those who perceived their health status as poor, the proportion of those with deteriorated health status was higher than those with maintained health status (p=0.0004). Among those who reported performing strength training three or more times per week, the proportion of those with maintained health status was higher than those with deteriorated health status (p=0.0024).
On grouping the participants according to BMI before military service, BMI in the underweight group increased during military service, whereas that in the overweight group decreased, showing that BMI returned to normal ranges during military service (Table 3). The mean BMI in the underweight group increased by 5.87 kg/m2 during service, while that in the normal weight group increased by 1.18 kg/m2. In contrast, the mean BMI in the overweight group decreased by 5.47 kg/m2 during service. There was a statistically significant change in BMI in all groups (p<0.0001).
In the underweight group, most participants had an improvement in weight (171, 74.4%) during military service. In the normal weight group, most participants maintained their weight. Similarly, most participants in the overweight group showed improvement during service (p<0.0001). A total of 74.4% of participants who were underweight and 82.2% of participants with obesity before military service showed improvements and attained normal weights during service (p<0.0001) (Table 4). Changes in body weight according to military characteristics were also observed (online supplementary appendix A–C).
The OR for an improved BMI in the subjective good health group compared with the subjective poor health group was statistically significant (OR=1.71, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.87). The OR for an improved BMI was significantly higher in the group with three or more times per week of strength training than in the group with one to two times per week of strength training and was higher among the marines compared with the Army soldiers (OR=1.48, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.12 and OR=2.15, 95% CI 1.07 to 4.32, respectively) (Table 5).
This study investigated changes in BMI among enlisted men before and during military service and showed that the pattern of change was an improvement in health status. Our results revealed that 74.4% of soldiers who were underweight (BMI <18.5 kg/m2) before military service improved to normal weight, with an average BMI increase of 5.87 kg/m2, whereas 82.2% of those who were overweight (BMI >25 kg/m2) before service improved to normal weight, with an average BMI decrease of 5.47 kg/m2 (Tables 3 and 4). These findings are consistent with the results of a previous study on changes in BMI before and during military service20 and a previous study on BMI according to military service area (geographical area).33 Positive effects on BMI are expected as a result of regular diet and exercise characteristic of military life.
When we investigated factors including the general and military characteristics of the participants, we found that age, subjective health status, strength exercise and military variables were all significantly associated with improvements in BMI (Table 5). Enlisted men aged 20–21 years were more likely to show improvements in BMI than those aged over 21 years. These results are consistent with those of previous studies involving adolescents and adults, which showed that excess weight increases with age.26 34 In contrast, another study analysing changes in obesity status among enlisted soldiers before and during military service20 showed that BMI in older age groups decreased during military service.
BMI was more likely to improve in participants who perceived their health status as good than in those who perceived their health status as poor. This result is consistent with the results of a previous study in adults.35 BMI of those who performed strength training three or more times per week was more likely to improve than those who performed strength training one to two times per week. The analysis of the changes in BMI with respect to participants’ general characteristics also showed that strength training was a variable exhibiting significant differences between the groups (Table 1). Performing strength training had significant effects on both changes in BMI and improvements in weight. Therefore, further studies that can reflect changing exercise trends while measuring strength exercise as a key variable of physical activity are required.
Among the military forces (Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force), the proportion of participants who improved to normal weight from overweight before military service was highest in the marines, and the proportion of those who deteriorated to overweight or underweight from normal weight before service was lowest also in the marines (online supplementary appendix B,C). Our analysis showed that the marines were significantly more likely to show improvements in BMI than the Army soldiers, who showed consistent results.
This study has limitations. First, we did not investigate eating habits, a major contributor to obesity. In the military, enlisted men are supposed to eat at designated times following a planned diet of 3300 kcal per day, which means that eating habits in the military are more controlled than among civilians. However, differences may still occur in individuals’ meal sizes and snack intake. Second, the Military Health Survey used in this study was conducted among enlisted men during service. Therefore, if the general characteristics of the survey participants changed during their military service, for example, if sleep duration was shorter than before service, the data collected would not reflect such changes. Third, military service can lead participants to change many aspects of their lifestyle, such as smoking, physical activity and sleep, from their lifestyle before service. Fourth, these results may not be generalisable to non-conscripted Armed Forces as our population only consisted of enlisted Armed Forces. Any generalisations to other Armed Forces which rely on volunteers who arrive fitter than the conscripted are not recommended in similar studies associated with BMI. Further studies are required with regard to changes in health behaviour before and during military service. These could build on the Military Health Survey, which is conducted at the time of enlistment and which could help overcome the limitations of previous cross-sectional studies that have relied on recollections of concerned participants.
This study also has strengths. To our knowledge, it is the first to investigate BMI among enlisted men using a representative sample from the Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force. Moreover, we identified changes in individual participants’ BMI by merging the Military Health Survey data with participants’ Military Entrance Physical Examination data. In addition, this study not only analysed changes in BMI in terms of gain and loss but also determined whether the pattern of such changes led to an improvement in health. Lastly, a military health survey is conducted among current officers and soldiers from July to August. To compare the parameters before and during military service of 1972 participants enrolled in the study, we matched the before military service data with the physical examination data collected on the day of enlistment. This made it possible to control for the time between enlistment and survey completion, resulting in a better understanding of the intensity and duration of the training received.
The results show that the majority of participants with abnormal weight, either overweight or underweight, improved to normal weight. Future research is required to analyse the differences in military obesity management programmes among the Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps and to develop standardised health promotion programmes.
In our investigation, strength training showed a statistically significant increase in BMI during military service. Furthermore, BMI in men who were underweight before their service increased, whereas BMI in those who were overweight decreased. This pattern indicates that BMI returns to normal ranges during military life.
Data availability statement
No data are available.
Patient consent for publication
The study was approved by the institutional review board of the Armed Forces Medical Command (AFMC-15060-IRB-15-049).
BNL and SWB contributed equally.
Contributors BNL, SWB, SYO, JHY, JR and JUW conceived and planned the study. BNL, SWB, SYO and JHY performed the analysis. BNL, SWB and SYO wrote the original draft with input from all authors. BNL, SWB and JHY visualised the results. SYO, JR and JUW validated the study. BNL, SWB, SYO and JUW contributed to the interpretation of the results. JUW supervised the entire process. All of the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.