Article Text
Abstract
Background The purpose was to describe an activity-based psychological hardiness training programme delivered by an occupational therapist and examine its acceptability and effectiveness in improving hardiness.
Method Participants (N=28) completed the 6-hour programme, which included pre/post-programme completion of the Dispositional Resilience Scale-15 (DRS-15) and a Program Evaluation Form. Paired t-tests were used to determine differences between pre-training and post-training scores on the DRS-15.
Results Results showed a significant increase (p<0.05) in total hardiness, commitment, and control scores on the DRS-15 from pre-training to post-training and good–excellent ratings for all categories on the Program Evaluation Form.
Conclusions This programme evaluation described an occupational therapist’s role in providing an activity-based psychological hardiness training programme and provided preliminary support for the acceptability of an activity-based approach to training psychological hardiness for service members.
- education & training (see medical education & training)
- rehabilitation medicine
- medical education & training
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. Not applicable.
Statistics from Altmetric.com
- education & training (see medical education & training)
- rehabilitation medicine
- medical education & training
Data availability statement
Data are available upon reasonable request. Not applicable.
Footnotes
Contributors JJ, BM, ES and AW contributed to conception and design of the study. BR, GC and AP contributed to acquisition of data. JJ and BM analysed and interpreted the data. ES, AW, GC and BR revised the manuscript for important intellectual content. JJ, BM, ES, AW, GC, BR and AP approved the version of the manuscript to be published.
Funding This research received funding from the Organized Research Unit at the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio ('no grant number').
Disclaimer The views and information presented are those of the authors and do not represent the official position of the US Army Medical Center of Excellence, the US Army Training and Doctrine Command, or the Departments of Army, Department of Defense, of US Government.
Competing interests None declared.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.