Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Preface to the special edition: personalised medicine in military mental health and performance
  1. Sebastian R Schnellbacher1 and
  2. M McCauley2
  1. 1 Munson Army Health Center, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, Missouri, USA
  2. 2 School of Psychology, Trinity College, University of Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr M McCauley; drmmccauley{at}yahoo.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Military conflict has long been a comorbid state of the human condition. Over the last two centuries, technological advancements have led to a dramatic increase in both the lethality of weapon systems and combat casualties. Military personnel in the American Civil War, World War I, World War II, the Korean Conflict, the Vietnam War and others suffered tremendously high casualty rates on the battlefield.1 Over the last 20 years, most military conflict has temporarily shifted from large-scale combat operations (LSCO) between two foes of relatively equal strength to asymmetric operations, primarily coalition security and peacekeeping operations, such as in Afghanistan, Iraq and Syria.2 A generation of military planners has grown up with assumptions of airspace dominance, ‘the golden hour’ and adequate medical assets.2 3 Unfortunately, increasing tensions between global powers have reminded the world that LSCO and widespread military conflicts are more likely to arise in the future, and recent international conflict in Europe has demonstrated that many reflexes gained over the last 20 years will not be applicable in these LSCO environments.4 …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors SRS is the lead author and functions as the guarantor. MC is the second author.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed.