You are here

Article Text

Article menu
Download PDFPDF
Personal view
ACLR and military service: time to rethink?
  1. David Charles Cain1 and
  2. P Parker2
  1. 1Academic Military Trauma and Orthopaedics, RCDM, Birmingham, UK
  2. 2Trauma and Orthopaedics, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Flt Lt David Charles Cain, Academic Military Trauma & Orthopaedics, RCDM, Birmingham, UK; david.cain7{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common injury that affects young, active individuals, normally managed with reconstruction in this age group. Current UK Armed Forces policy precludes prospective applicants from joining with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). This isdue to the perceived risk of premature osteoarthritis (OA), graft rupture or clinical failure, all of which could make the service person medically non-deployable.

The most recent evidence shows that an ACL rupture without associated significant meniscal or osteochondral defect has a similar likelihood of developing OA as to that of the uninjured knee after reconstruction at 20 years postoperatively.

Applicants should be considered for service following an ACL rupture without significant concurrent meniscal or osteochondral defect who have undergone ACLR and 18 months of rehabilitation. We recommend these applicants to be graded P2 Medically Fully Deployable (MFD) as per the Joint Service Publication (JSP) guidance for service personnel who undergo ACLR.

  • ORTHOPAEDIC & TRAUMA SURGERY
  • Knee
  • OCCUPATIONAL & INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE
  • Health policy
  • Rehabilitation medicine

https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2022-002261

Statistics from Altmetric.com

    Request Permissions

    If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

    View Full Text

    Footnotes

    • Twitter @d_c_cain

    • Contributors DCC: literature review and manuscript writing. PP: initial concept and manuscript proofreading.

    • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

    • Competing interests None declared.

    • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.