Article Text

other Versions

Download PDFPDF
Understanding occipital pressure sores in UK military casualties: a pilot study in healthy military personnel
  1. Panagiotis Chatzistergos1,
  2. T E Scott1,2,3,
  3. M Thorburn4 and
  4. N Chockalingam1,5
  1. 1Centre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  2. 2Intensive Care Unit, University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK
  3. 3Academic Department of Military Anaesthesia and Critical Care, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
  4. 4Academic Department of Military Nursing, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
  5. 5Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Malta, Msida, Malta
  1. Correspondence to Dr Panagiotis Chatzistergos, Centre for Biomechanics and Rehabilitation Technologies, Staffordshire University, Stoke-on-Trent ST4 2DE, UK; panagiotis.chatzistergos{at}staffs.ac.uk

Abstract

Introduction The high prevalence of occipital ulcers in UK military casualties observed during the conflict in Afghanistan is a multifactorial phenomenon. However, the consensus is that ulceration is triggered by excessive pressure that is maintained for too long during the use of the general service military stretcher. Thresholds for capillary occlusion are accepted benchmarks to define excessive pressure, but similar thresholds for safe/excessive duration of pressure application do not exist. To address this gap in knowledge, we propose to use the time it takes for a healthy person to feel pain at the back of the head as an initial indication of safe exposure to pressure.

Methods Healthy military personnel (16 male/10 female) were asked to lie motionless on a typical general service stretcher until they felt pain. Time-to-pain and the location of pain were recorded. To support the interpretation of results, baseline sensitivity to pain and pressure distribution at the back of the head were also measured. Independent samples t-test was used to assess differences between genders.

Results Twenty participants felt pressure-induced soft-tissue pain at the back of the head. The remaining six participants terminated the test due to musculoskeletal pain caused by poor ergonomic positioning. On average, pain at the occiput developed after 31 min (±14 min). Female participants were significantly more sensitive to pain (t(24)=3.038,p=0.006), but time-to-pain did not differ significantly between genders (p>0.05).

Conclusions When people lie motionless on a typical military stretcher, the back of the head is the first area of the body that becomes painful due to pressure. The fact that pain develops in ≈30 min can help healthcare providers decide how frequently to reposition their patients who are unable to do this on their own. More research is still needed to directly link time-to-pain with time-to-injury.

  • adult intensive & critical care
  • wound management
  • preventive medicine

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. The collected data will be made available in an anonymised form on reasonable request.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

Data are available on reasonable request. The collected data will be made available in an anonymised form on reasonable request.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Correction notice This article has been corrected since it first published. Figure 4 has been replaced for a spelling error.

  • Contributors TES and MT conceptualised the present study. All the authors were involved into planning and implementation. PC and NC led data collection. The statistical analysis of results was done by PC. All authors were involved in the interpretation of results and drawing of final conclusions. PC and TES led the preparation of the manuscript, which was revised and finalised by MT and NC. PC is responsible for the overall content of this study as guarantor.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.