Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Incidence of cervical spine injury in victims of dismounted blast: a systematic review
  1. Will Sargent1,2,
  2. R Henson1,
  3. R Millar1,
  4. A Ramasamy1,2,3,
  5. I Gibb2,4 and
  6. A Bull2
  1. 1Army Medical Service, Camberley, Surrey, UK
  2. 2Centre for Injury Studies, Imperial College London, London, UK
  3. 3Academic Department of Military Trauma and Orthopaedics, Defence Medical Services, Camberley, UK
  4. 4Centre for Defence Radiology, HMS Nelson, Portsmouth, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Will Sargent; william.sargent{at}nhs.net

Abstract

Introduction Dismounted blast has the potential to cause life-threatening injuries to multiple simultaneous casualties, including injury to the cervical spine (c-spine). Spinal immobilisation can be costly in terms of time and personnel required to apply and sustain it. C-spine ‘clearing’ tools frequently do not apply to the blast-injured casualty, so clinical judgement must be used to determine those requiring c-spine immobilisation. This will be strongly influenced by the likelihood of such an injury, but currently, the incidence of c-spine injury in dismounted blasts is not known.

Methods We searched PubMed, EMBASE and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health for original research reporting the number of patients suffering c-spine injury as a result of the dismounted blast, as well as indices of injury severity such as incidence of limb amputation. Rates were combined to give an overall incidence. The systematic review was preregistered with PROSPERO (CRD42024527592).

Results 2775 unique studies were identified, 13 of which were analysed. Reported incidences of c-spine injuries ranged from 0% to 5.85% across all 13 studies, and unstable injuries ranged from 0% to 1.23% in the nine studies in which this could be calculated. After excluding one study due to an overlapping population, in 7889 patients the rate of c-spine injury was 0.89%. In the 4618 patients for which the incidence of unstable c-spine injury could be calculated, the rate was 0.30%. There was no correlation between the rate of amputation and the rate of c-spine injury (Spearman’s ρ=0.226, p=0.667).

Conclusion Dismounted blasts result in a very low rate of c-spine injury. The populations sampled included a number of seriously injured casualties with potentially life-threatening wounds, such as limb amputation. We recommend deprioritising c-spine control in dismounted victims of the blast in favour of focusing the limited time and resources on addressing potentially life-threatening injuries.

  • Spine
  • Military Personnel
  • Neurological injury
  • Trauma management

Data availability statement

There are no data in this work.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Data availability statement

There are no data in this work.

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors WS is the guarantor for the study.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Supplemental material This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.