RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Musculoskeletal injury in military Special Operations Forces: a systematic review
JF BMJ Military Health
JO BMJ Mil Health
FD British Medical Journal Publishing Group
SP 255
OP 265
DO 10.1136/bmjmilitary-2020-001692
VO 167
IS 4
A1 Joanne Stannard
A1 L Fortington
YR 2021
UL http://militaryhealth.bmj.com/content/167/4/255.abstract
AB Introduction Special Operations Forces conduct military activities using specialised and unconventional techniques that offer a unique and complementary capability to conventional forces. These activities expose Special Operations Forces personnel to different injury risks in comparison with personnel in the conventional forces. Consequently, different injury patterns are expected in this population. The purpose of this research is to establish high-level evidence informing what is known about musculoskeletal injury epidemiology in Special Operations Forces.Methods A systematic review was conducted using three online databases to identify original studies reporting musculoskeletal injury data in Special Operations Forces. A critical appraisal tool was applied to all included studies. Descriptive data were extracted for demographics, study design details and injuries (eg, injury frequency, injury type, body part injured, activity, mechanism, severity). Results were narratively synthesised.Results Twenty-one studies were included. Trainees conducting qualification training had the highest injury frequency, up to 68% injured in a training period. The ankle, knee and lumbar spine were the most common body parts affected. Parachuting caused the most severe injuries. Physical training was the most common activity causing injury, accounting for up to 80% of injuries. Running and lifting were common injury mechanisms. Injury causation information was frequently not reported. Partially validated surveillance methods limited many studies.Conclusions Injuries are prevalent in Special Operation Forces. Future research should prioritise identifying injury causation information that supports prevention. Focus on improving surveillance methods to enhance the accuracy and comparison of results across cohorts is also recommended.All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as online supplemental information.