PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Fisher, Andrew David AU - April, M D AU - Gurney, J M AU - Shackelford, S A AU - Luppens, C AU - Schauer, S G TI - Analysis of emergency resuscitative thoracotomy in the combat setting AID - 10.1136/military-2024-002797 DP - 2024 Aug 29 TA - BMJ Military Health PG - e002797 4099 - http://militaryhealth.bmj.com/content/early/2024/08/29/military-2024-002797.short 4100 - http://militaryhealth.bmj.com/content/early/2024/08/29/military-2024-002797.full AB - Introduction Emergency resuscitative thoracotomy (ERT) is a resource-intensive procedure that can deplete a combat surgical team’s supply and divert attention from casualties with more survivable injuries. An understanding of survival after ERT in the combat trauma population will inform surgical decision-making.Methods We requested all encounters from 2007 to 2023 from the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DoDTR). We analysed any documented thoracotomy in the emergency department and excluded any case for which it was not possible to distinguish ERT from operating room thoracotomy. The primary outcome was 24-hour mortality.Results There were 48 301 casualties within the original dataset. Of those, 154 (0.3%) received ERT, with 114 non-survivors and 40 survivors at 24 hours. There were 26 (17%) survivors at 30 days. The majority were performed in role 3. The US military made up the largest proportion among the non-survivors and survivors. Explosives predominated in both groups (61% and 65%). Median Composite Injury Severity Scores were lower among the non-survivors (19 vs 33). Non-survivors had a lower proportion of serious head injuries (13% vs 40%) and thorax injuries (32% vs 58%). Median RBC consumption was lower among non-survivors (10 units vs 19 units), as was plasma (6 vs 16) and platelets (0 vs 3). The most frequent interventions and surgical procedures were exploratory thoracotomy (n=140), chest thoracostomy (n=137), open cardiac massage (n=131) and closed cardiac massage (n=121).Conclusion ERT in this group of combat casualties resulted in 26% survival at 24 hours. Although this proportion is higher than that reported in civilian data, more rigorous prospective studies would need to be conducted or improvement in the DoDTR data capture methods would need to be implemented to determine the utility of ERT in combat populations.Data are available upon reasonable request.