Elsevier

The Lancet Neurology

Volume 7, Issue 8, August 2008, Pages 728-741
The Lancet Neurology

Review
Moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in adults

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70164-9Get rights and content

Summary

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major health and socioeconomic problem that affects all societies. In recent years, patterns of injury have been changing, with more injuries, particularly contusions, occurring in older patients. Blast injuries have been identified as a novel entity with specific characteristics. Traditional approaches to the classification of clinical severity are the subject of debate owing to the widespread policy of early sedation and ventilation in more severely injured patients, and are being supplemented with structural and functional neuroimaging. Basic science research has greatly advanced our knowledge of the mechanisms involved in secondary damage, creating opportunities for medical intervention and targeted therapies; however, translating this research into patient benefit remains a challenge. Clinical management has become much more structured and evidence based since the publication of guidelines covering many aspects of care. In this Review, we summarise new developments and current knowledge and controversies, focusing on moderate and severe TBI in adults. Suggestions are provided for the way forward, with an emphasis on epidemiological monitoring, trauma organisation, and approaches to management.

Introduction

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) constitutes a major health and socioeconomic problem throughout the world.1, 2 It is the leading cause of mortality and disability among young individuals in high-income countries, and globally the incidence of TBI is rising sharply, mainly due to increasing motor-vehicle use in low-income and middle-income countries. WHO has projected that, by 2020, traffic accidents will be the third greatest cause of the global burden of disease and injury.3 In higher income countries, traffic safety laws and preventive measures have reduced the incidence of TBI due to traffic accidents,4 whereas the incidence of TBI caused by falls is increasing as the population ages, leading to a rise in the median age of TBI populations (table 1). This has consequences for the type of brain damage currently seen, and contusions (falls in older patients) are becoming more frequent than diffuse injuries (high-velocity traffic accidents in younger patients).

Violence is now reported as the cause of closed head injury in approximately 7–10% of cases,9, 10 a substantial increase from earlier studies. The incidence of penetrating brain injury is also increasing, particularly in the USA, due to the use of firearms in violence-related injuries. Worldwide, armed conflicts and terrorist activities are causing more brain injuries, often due to improvised explosive devices, to the extent that blast injuries of the brain are now recognised as a specific entity. The changing patterns of injury and treatment approaches have challenged current concepts of classification. Moreover, basic research has greatly advanced our knowledge of what happens in the brain after TBI, offering opportunities to limit processes involved in secondary brain damage. However, translating advances from basic research into clinical benefit has proven complex. Here, we discuss current knowledge and novel insights and controversies in the study of adults with moderate and severe TBI, with the aim of integrating basic science and clinical research to provide guidelines on the epidemiological monitoring of TBI, trauma organisation, and management at the acute stage.

Section snippets

Epidemiology and cost

In the USA, monitoring by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention shows the annual incidence of emergency department visits and hospital admissions for TBI to be 403 per 100 000 and 85 per 100 000, respectively.11 Epidemiological data on TBI from the European Union are scarce, but do indicate an annual aggregate incidence of hospitalised and fatal TBI of approximately 235 per 100 000,12 similar to that found in Australia,13 although substantial variation exists between European

Classification

TBI can be isolated, but is associated with extracranial injuries (limb fractures, thoracic or abdominal injuries) in about 35% of cases,19 which increases the risk of secondary brain damage due to hypoxia, hypotension, pyrexia, and coagulopathy. The recording of the severity of extracranial injuries should therefore form an integral part of TBI classification (panel).

Traditionally, TBI has been classified by mechanism (closed vs penetrating), by clinical severity (Glasgow coma scale [GCS]20),

Primary damage

TBI is a heterogeneous disorder with different forms of presentation. The unifying factor is that brain damage results from external forces, as a consequence of direct impact, rapid acceleration or deceleration, a penetrating object (eg, gunshot), or blast waves from an explosion. The nature, intensity, direction, and duration of these forces determine the pattern and extent of damage.

On the macroscopic level, damage includes shearing of white-matter tracts, focal contusions, haematomas

Diagnosis

Head injury does not always implicate TBI. A diagnosis of TBI is established on the basis of clinical symptoms: for example, the presence of any documented loss of consciousness and/or amnesia (retrograde or post-traumatic). Additional clinical investigations can be driven by the patient's level of awareness, presence of risk factors, and mechanisms of injury (figure 2).

CT is the preferred method of assessment on admission to determine structural damage and to detect (developing) intracranial

Guidelines and individualised management

Over the past 10 years, much of the treatment of TBI has evolved towards standardised approaches that follow international and national guidelines (table 2). International guidelines for severe head injury are mostly evidence based, and address specific aspects of management. National guidelines focus more on organisational issues, such as admission and referral policy; however, these remain limited to the constraints of existing trauma systems, and clear statements on the best trauma

Pre-hospital emergency care

The main goals of prehospital management are to prevent hypoxia and hypotension, because these systemic insults lead to secondary brain damage.68, 81 When assessed before hospital admission (by ambulance or helicopter crews), oxygen saturation below 90% is found in 44–55% of cases and hypotension in 20–30%.81, 82, 83 Trauma renders the brain more vulnerable to these insults,84 and hypoxia and hypotension are strongly associated with poor outcome (hypoxia: odds ratio [OR] 2·1, 95% CI 1·7–2·6;

Outcome and prognosis

Outcome after head injury is generally assessed at 6 months after injury, representing a compromise between true final outcome and logistic limitations. Experience shows that about 85% of recovery occurs within this time period, but further recovery can occur later. Accurate and consistent outcome determination at a fixed timepoint is a prerequisite for any TBI study. The most frequently used global outcome measure in TBI is the Glasgow outcome scale. More specific tools are required for

Neuroprotection and clinical trials

The original concept of neuroprotection involved the initiation of treatment before the onset of the event, and was aimed at minimising the intensity of an insult or its immediate effects on the brain by interrupting the harmful cascades of biochemical events. A major new focus of neurobiology now revolves around cell replacement, aimed at promoting neuroplasticity, and regeneration or replacement of lost neuronal and glial cells and neuronal circuits. Over the past 25 years, over 20 agents

Future directions

Here, we have illustrated the seriousness and complexity of the problems posed by TBI to patients, relatives, doctors, authorities, and society alike. Great advancements have been achieved over the past 10–15 years, but advances in basic science have not yet led to new treatments of clinically proven benefit, and advanced monitoring has not routinely resulted in individualised management. Current classification systems are no longer sufficient and not all patients have access to the best care.

Search strategy and selection criteria

References for this Review were identified through searches of PubMed, by use of the search terms “traumatic brain injury” or “head injury” and other appropriate targets, such as “epidemiology”, “pathophysiology”, and “guidelines”, up to May, 2008. Papers were also identified from the authors' own files and from references cited in relevant articles. An electronic search of resources, such as international and national guidelines and book chapters, was also done. The final reference list

References (160)

  • TB Cole

    Global road safety crisis remedy sought: 1·2 million killed, 50 million injured annually

    JAMA

    (2004)
  • AM Foulkes et al.

    The Traumatic Coma Data Bank; design, methods and baseline characteristics

    J Neurosurg

    (1991)
  • LS Murray et al.

    Head injuries in four British neurosurgical centres

    Br J Neurosurg

    (1999)
  • GD Murray et al.

    The European Brain Consortium survey of head injuries

    Acta Neurochir (Wien)

    (1999)
  • M Rusnak et al.

    Severe traumatic brain injury in Austria. I: Introduction to the study

    Wien Klin Wochenschr

    (2007)
  • I Butcher et al.

    The prognostic value of cause of injury in traumatic brain injury: results from the IMPACT study

    J Neurotrauma

    (2007)
  • J Jiang et al.

    Violent trauma in China: report of 2254 cases

    Surg Neurol

    (2007)
  • JA Langlois et al.

    Traumatic brain injury in the United States: emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and deaths

    (2006)
  • F Tagliaferri et al.

    A systematic review of brain injury epidemiology in Europe

    Acta Neurochir (Wien)

    (2006)
  • S Hillier et al.

    Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in South Australia

    Brain Inj

    (1997)
  • S Thornhill et al.

    Disability in young people and adults one year after head injury: prospective cohort study

    BMJ

    (2000)
  • S Polinder et al.

    Cost estimation of injury-related hospital admissions in 10 European countries

    J Trauma

    (2005)
  • S Polinder et al.

    Assessing the burden of injury in six European countries

    Bull World Health Organ

    (2007)
  • DJ Thurman

    Epidemiology and economics of head trauma

  • P Sobocki et al.

    Brain research has high returns but Europe is lagging behind

    Eur J Neurol

    (2007)
  • TA Gennarelli et al.

    Mortality in patients with head injury and extracranial injury treated in trauma centers

    J Trauma

    (1990)
  • LF Marshall et al.

    A new classification of head injury based on computerized tomography

    J Neurosurg

    (1991)
  • M Balestreri et al.

    Predictive value of Glasgow Coma Scale after brain trauma: change in trend over the past ten years

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • N Stocchetti et al.

    Inaccurate early assessment of neurological severity in head injury

    J Neurotrauma

    (2004)
  • AI Maas et al.

    Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors

    Neurosurgery

    (2005)
  • Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development and...
  • Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: practical prognostic models based on large cohort of international patients

    BMJ

    (2008)
  • D Menon et al.

    Prognostic modelling in traumatic brain injury

    BMJ

    (2008)
  • Maas AI, Lingsma HF. New approaches to increase statistical power in TBI trials: insights from the IMPACT study group....
  • DI Graham et al.

    Trauma

  • S Okie

    Traumatic brain injury in the war zone

    N Engl J Med

    (2005)
  • G Zoroya

    Scientists: brain injuries from war worse than thought

    USA Today

    (Nov 5, 2007)
  • KH Taber et al.

    Blast-related traumatic brain injury: what is known?

    J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci

    (2006)
  • RA Armonda et al.

    Wartime traumatic cerebral vasospasm: recent review of combat casualties

    Neurosurgery

    (2006)
  • SC Stein et al.

    Intravascular coagulation: a major secondary insult in nonfatal traumatic brain injury

    J Neurosurg

    (2002)
  • S Harhangi et al.

    Coagulation disorders after traumatic brain injury

    Acta Neurochir (Wien)

    (2008)
  • RS Clark et al.

    Autophagy is increased in mice after traumatic brain injury and is detectable in human brain after trauma and critical illness

    Autophagy

    (2008)
  • Y Lai et al.

    Autophagy is increased after traumatic brain injury in mice and is partially inhibited by the antioxidant gamma-glutamylcysteinyl ethyl ester

    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab

    (2008)
  • MC Morganti-Kossmann et al.

    Inflammatory response in acute traumatic brain injury: a double-edged sword

    Curr Opin Crit Care

    (2002)
  • G Kroemer et al.

    Mitochondrial membrane permeabilization in cell death

    Physiol Rev

    (2007)
  • MN Diringer et al.

    Regional cerebrovascular and metabolic effects of hyperventilation after severe traumatic brain injury

    J Neurosurg

    (2002)
  • JP Coles et al.

    Effect of hyperventilation on cerebral blood flow in traumatic head injury: clinical relevance and monitoring correlates

    Crit Care Med

    (2002)
  • P Vespa et al.

    Metabolic crisis without brain ischemia is common after traumatic brain injury: a combined microdialysis and positron emission tomography study

    J Cereb Blood Flow Metab

    (2005)
  • M Oertel et al.

    Posttraumatic vasospasm: the epidemiology, severity, and time course of an underestimated phenomenon: a prospective study performed in 299 patients

    J Neurosurg

    (2005)
  • A Chieregato et al.

    Xenon-CT and transcranial Doppler in poor-grade or complicated aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhage patients undergoing aggressive management of intracranial hypertension

    Intensive Care Med

    (2006)
  • Cited by (1607)

    • Trehalose: A promising new treatment for traumatic brain injury? A systematic review of animal evidence

      2024, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case Management
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text