Paper
A clinical review of bleeding dilemmas in trauma

https://doi.org/10.1053/j.seminhematol.2003.11.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Trauma is rapidly replacing stroke and cardiovascular disease as a leading cause of death in Western countries such as the United States, and almost a third (30%) of trauma deaths are due to blood loss. Although the new intervention strategies that have been developed and adopted by emergency care staff have reduced this mortality in recent years, bleeding continues to be a major challenge in the management of trauma patients. This paper reviews recent developments and controversies in trauma care, and, in particular, the potential role of procoagulant therapy using recombinant factor VIIa in the prevention of mortality due to bleeding.

Section snippets

The changing role of fluid resuscitation

Until the 1990s, the standard intervention for hypotensive trauma patients was aggressive fluid resuscitation with the goal of restoring end-organ perfusion and oxygen delivery prior to surgery. Increase in circulating volume also increases cardiac output and blood pressure. However, it was suggested as early as 19206 that a sudden increase in blood pressure may prove detrimental since it has the potential to precipitate rebleeding from sites where physiological mechanisms have brought about

Potential roles of procoagulant therapy

Although there are limited data on the use of rFVIIa in the acute management of trauma patients, procoagulant intervention offers some intriguing potential benefits. It appears likely that rFVIIa could potentially play an important future role in reducing fatalities due to hemorrhage following trauma. A hypotensive patient reaching hospital has already lost about a third of their blood volume and will die after losing about 800 mL more blood. Thus, any intervention that limits blood loss at an

Conclusions

  • Targeted hypotensive resuscitation may offer better survival than aggressive fluid resuscitation.

  • Maintaining stability of primary hemostasis at the site of injury that limits bleeding is an important consideration in the acute management of trauma patients.

  • New interventions such as procoagulant therapy using rFVIIa are likely to become important elements in preventing mortality due to bleeding following trauma.

  • Further trials are needed to explore the potential benefits of procoagulant

References (22)

  • E. de Guzman et al.

    Limited volume resuscitation in penetrating thoracoabdominal trauma

    AACN Clin Issues

    (1999)
  • Cited by (80)

    • Coagulopathy and haemorrhagic progression in traumatic brain injury: advances in mechanisms, diagnosis, and management

      2017, The Lancet Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The prevalence of coagulopathy in TBI at admission to hospital ranges from 7%14 to 63%,16 reflecting the wide variation in definitions of TBI and coagulopathy (table 1). Coagulopathy occurs in more than 60% of patients with severe TBI,3,4 but is uncommon in mild head injury (<1%).35 Although the prevalence of coagulopathy in isolated TBI (ie, in the absence of additional traumatic injuries) is not higher when compared with systemic injuries of similar severity, the coincidence of both TBI and systemic injury could substantially increase the magnitude of coagulopathy beyond that seen in the isolated condition.19,23,36–38

    • Management of neurologic complications of coagulopathies

      2017, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      There is evidence that injury severity is an important risk factor in predicting coagulopathy. Over 60% of patients with severe TBI have coagulopathy compared to < 1% with mild head injury (Gómez et al., 1996; Hoyt, 2004). Bleeding complications are common in the setting of malignancy, especially leukemias.

    • Critical care management of traumatic brain injury

      2017, Handbook of Clinical Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the other end of the translational pathway there has been increasing interest in using precision medicine and comparative effectiveness research (Maas et al., 2012) to advance research and clinical care in TBI – these themes are the focus of a large international initiative (http://intbir.nih.gov/). TBI is associated with both hemostatic deficits and hypercoagulopathy (Laroche et al., 2012; Maegele, 2013), with up to 60% of patients showing abnormal values in severe TBI (Hoyt, 2004). Risk factors include injury severity, age, and prehospital hypotension (Wafaisade et al., 2010a, b).

    • Carboxyfullerene nanoparticles alleviate acute hepatic injury in severe hemorrhagic shock

      2017, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hemorrhagic shock is the leading cause of potentially preventable deaths in civilian and military trauma, accounting for up to 40% of the deaths associated with traumatic injuries [1].

    • Low-dose recombinant factor VIIa for reversing coagulopathy in patients with isolated traumatic brain injury

      2015, Journal of Critical Care
      Citation Excerpt :

      Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of injury-related hospitalization, disability, and death worldwide [1]. Coagulopathies are common in patients with TBI [2,3]. In a previous study, we demonstrated that coagulation abnormalities were present in about 50% of patients with severe TBI [4].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text