Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Health engagement sessions as a means of addressing reproductive health inequalities in a population of Afghan women during Operation ALLIED SOLACE
  1. James Victor Roe1 and
  2. P Webster2
  1. 1 Disaster Assistance Response Team, Army Medical Service 5 Armoured Medical Regiment, Catterick, UK
  2. 2 Disaster Assistance Response Team, Samaritan's Purse, Boone, North Carolina, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr P Webster, Samaritan's Purse, Boone, NC 28607, USA; pwebster{at}kc.rr.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

It is well understood that humanitarian crises and displacement of people predispose women to poor reproductive health outcomes. Inci et al 1 have identified supply chain limitations, provider biases and differences in cultural and religious attitudes as key variables which influence the access women have to family planning services within the refugee setting. Operation ALLIED SOLACE provided the British Army an opportunity to provide logistic and humanitarian support to such a population relocated to a location known as The Village in Kosovo in the wake of the 2021 Afghanistan crisis.

Our team was aware at the outset that women’s health may be a difficult topic to discuss with Afghan women; therefore, a series of health engagement talks were planned and delivered on a voluntary basis. Here, issues surrounding female and reproductive health were outlined. This informal and gender-segregated setting also provided …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors JVR: design, data collection, data analysis, writing of the article. PW: data analysis, formatting.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.