Article Text

Download PDFPDF
The DMS must rapidly reshape its systems to cultivate and sustain innovation and the implementation of new digital technologies
  1. Andrew Buckley1,2 and
  2. N Tai1,3
  1. 1 UK STRATCOM, jHubMed, London, UK
  2. 2 Academic Department of Military Medicine, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
  3. 3 Academic Department of Military Surgery and Trauma, Royal Centre for Defence Medicine, Birmingham, UK
  1. Correspondence to Andrew Buckley, UK STRATCOM, jHubMed, London WC2B 6NH, UK; ambuckley{at}

Statistics from

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.


Released on 16 March 2021, the UK Government’s Integrated Review lays out an ambitious vision for the UK’s Security, Defence, Development and Foreign Policy over the coming decade and beyond.1 Core to this aim is an unprecedented focus on the necessity of purposeful, coherent innovation to deliver novel offensive and defensive capabilities; ones powered by the explosive rate of development in artificial intelligence, automation, cyber, sensing and a host of other digital technologies. The Review recognises that the Government’s security agenda is reliant on support to, and proper exploitation of, the UK’s highly competitive science and technology sector. Implementing the review in this regard will necessarily depend on how quickly defence can convert new knowledge, cultivated from the multiple silos constituting its research and development (R&D) ecosystem, into tangible and deployed capability.

Commercial suppliers must continually appraise opportunities to innovate as they optimise for shifting consumer trends or face commercial decline. A renewed focus on learning from this experience has yielded valuable lessons.2 In the digital space, the most agile and well-financed market players have invested heavily in technical expertise and R&D systems such that the leading edge is typically to be found within private enterprise. Indeed, this reversal of the innovation flow—where once it was Defence leading the agenda—has been implicitly acknowledged by the recent announcement to establish a UK version of the US’ renowned Defence Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) to regain the ‘high-risk, high-return’ ground ceded to industry.3

How, then, should Defence healthcare answer this call to arms, and—given that the UK Defence Medical Services (DMS) is held as an exemplar of an innovative organisation4—is there any real need to look afresh at the DMS’ capacity to innovate at pace?

The innovation triumvirate

Warfare is accompanied by the conditions that favour medical innovation; the Walker …

View Full Text


  • Twitter @drandrewbuckley

  • Contributors AMB and NT co-wrote the manuscript. AMB is guarantor of the work. NT planned the work and provided strategic direction.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.